It
has been a slow start back to work this New Year. I have been back for two
weeks but week one consisted of pastoral tutorials with the first year and
Monday week two was about catching up with those who weren’t spoken to the week
before. On the Tuesday we took the students on a tour of local galleries. Most
of this was to do with making sure students are well on with their modules and
that they understand what to do for each one. Not my most favorite aspect of
the job but it is now a technical requirement that students understand module
outcomes; they will be asked directly whether or not they were helped
understand how they would be assessed and answers go into the student survey,
which will at some point be published. Students are working on three modules.
The first of these, ‘Individual and Social’ will need to be handed in during
week three of the new term. This is the module most of us would have in the
past thought of as ‘studio practice’ or ‘the student’s work’. Alongside this module they are also developing
evidence for ‘Materials and Processes’, which is essentially a record of every
technical process they come across. It mainly consists of documenting inductions
into workshops, and the other module is ‘PPP1’ a professional development
module whereby everything from visits to art galleries, transcriptions of
artists talks, and reviews of art magazines is done. This can also be a blog,
so some students will just have to tell me they are ongoing with this as there
is no computer terminal available where I’m working. Both these modules will be
handed in later on nearer the end of the term. The rest of my time has been
spent doing dissertation tutorials. On Wednesday I sat from 9.00am till 7.45pm
doing these one after the other. The writing is now getting to the point that I
can see what is emerging and on the whole students are coping well with
something that can be an onerous task. The hand-in is mid February and once
that date passes I might reflect on the process.
Probably
the most interesting session last week was the galleries visit. We started with
our own gallery that is showing a curated response to the Brontes, a very
Yorkshire show, but one whereby I could explain how sometimes galleries will
work to a theme. In this case the work ranged from projection, via intricate
paper-cutting to weather records of the Yorkshire Moors. It was put on in
conjunction with a conference over at the university and curated by an
ex-member of staff, Nick Cass. This was
totally different to the show over at the Burton Gallery which was hosting
Christopher Wood an ex student from the 1980s. Chris has been painting for some
time now and has a solid reputation. This was his first one-man show in Leeds,
which surprised me. He was showing a lot of his prints, mono and etching in
particular. We also looked at how this was hung. The prints were all different
sizes and Chris had had them all hung to an invisible horizontal at an eye
level of about 4 feet from the floor. Students were asked to check fittings and
to think why each exhibition was hung differently. After looking at the
permanent collection we went on to the Henry Moore institute. The 1913 show is
very good, but I’m aware most students are not aware of how important some of
these pieces are. In particular I wonder how long it will be before we see a
classic Metaphysical De Chirico, Duchamp’s ‘Standard Stoppages’ and a Picasso
cubist still-life together on show again in Leeds. There is also an excellent
Helen Chadwick show on which details how she put together her light-boxes.
Colour tests, technical drawings, mock-ups etc. were all used to help get a
picture of how she went about thinking through the process, this was excellent
material for the PPP1 module. Hopefully it was also a useful experience for any
student thinking about what it is to be an artist. Before we left to go for
dinner all the students were inducted into the Henry Moore library, again a
fantastic resource.
The
afternoon was spent initially at the Leeds City Art Gallery Nike Savvas exhibition and students were
taken into the accompanying installation by Amanda Phillips the education
officer. Whether or not they liked the work, the control required to get all
the coloured tapes in place was a useful lesson, together of course with an
understanding of how the artist sent the work, (rolls of coloured plastic tapes
with instructions) an aspect of sending work off to exhibitions that is so
often forgotten about.
Finally
we went to ‘Mexico’ (an independent art space) and another ex-student, James
Maxfield gave a presentation as to how the space had developed. I could tell
this was where most of the students were at last taking an interest. The fact that the curators were young and not
long out of college obviously ticked their boxes and this was the first time
students asked questions all day. Fair enough I thought. This was something
they could relate to and James was able to explain to present students how his
second year cohort developed a gallery in a basement and that the experience
had been invaluable. Making links and networking as always seem to be the key
elements to getting off to a successful career. If only I had been better at
it.